Script Editor FAQs
Why is there an Incorrect Package Declaration Message in the Script Editor?
There is no requirement for you to fix existing scripts; it is just a recommendation.
Warning introduced in version 7.1.0
In version 7.1.0, we introduced a warning message to the Script Editor to flag invalid/missing package declarations in script files. The message stated these invalid/missing package declarations wouldn't be supported from version 9.0.0 onwards. However, this is no longer the case. We will not do anything that breaks existing usage in future releases.
You will see a warning message (shown below) if you create, or have previously created, a script file under a directory without specifying a valid package declaration, something that we encourage in our best practices guide. This warning displays in Script Editor or when adding a script file to a feature configuration screen.
There is a bug in version 7.1.0 relating to the mismatch of package declaration warnings in the script registry and script editor. Always refer to the warning(s) shown in Script Editor. This bug was fixed in version 7.3.0.
There is an additional bug that validates the last imported class in a script rather than the actual package declaration. This bug is due to be fixed in version 7.5.0.
Why we introduced a warning message
We recommended you use correct package declarations to prevent class name conflicts where you may have two files with the same name in different packages. For example, if you had foo/bar/file.groovy
and abc/pqr/file.groovy
without the package declaration, both would be loaded as file.class
. Suppose you have the same named script in two different directories, and you don't have correct package declarations and import them into another script. In that case, you can get non-deterministic behaviour regarding which script is imported.
Warning to be updated in an upcoming release
We are in the process of updating the warning to an information message, as we will not remove support for invalid/missing package declarations from version 9.0.0. We suggest you use packages correctly for new scripts/classes, but there is no requirement to fix existing scripts, unless you want to. In the meantime we are looking at what tools we can provide, so it's easier to update existing scripts.
How do you get rid of this message?
There is no way to bulk update incorrect package declarations and scripts that reference them. If you have multiple scripts that need updating, you need to update them one at a time.
Solution if there is no package declaration and the class isn't imported in any other script files
The solution is straightforward, and you must add the correct package declaration, as mentioned in the warning message at the top of the script.
For example, as mentioned in the screenshot above, adding package common
should remove the warning message.
Solution if there is no package declaration and the class is imported in other script files
If you have imported this class in another script, in addition to adding the correct package declaration, you must rectify the import
statement. For example, script files that import the class will show the error below.
As you can tell, if you had more than one file with the same name in different directories, it would not be possible to identify the correct class to load, which is one of the reasons for enforcing correct package declarations.
To fix this, update the import statement to include the package name. In this example, it is import
common.util
.
Solution if there is no package declaration and the directory structure is incorrect
A package declaration should be made up of valid identifiers and not contain any of the reserved keywords. We recommend that you follow the naming convention for Java Packages.
Sometimes, the directory names may contain identifiers not valid in a package name. For example, int/util.groovy
contains a keyword that can't be used as an identifier. In such cases, you will need to rename the directory structure so that it forms a valid package name.
- Rename the directory to something like
int_/util.groovy
. - Add the correct package declaration to the
util.groovy
after the directory is renamed, for example,package int_
. - Update import statements in any scripts that import this class.
- Change import statements from
import util
toimport int_.util
. - Since you changed the directory name, you need to update any references to this file. If the file was used in a listener configuration, edit the configuration and choose the file in the renamed directory.
When is the issue object available by default in the script editor?
The issue object is available in the following contexts:
Post-functions
Listeners (as
event.issue
)The issue binding variable is only available for events that contain a single issue object. This means only issue events (excluding issue link events).
Behaviours (as
underlyingIssue
)Not available on the Create screen.
Scripted Fields
You will have to declare a specific issue object in the following contexts:
Script Console
Mail Handler