Static Type Checking

Static type checking (STC) provides information about whether your script is correctly written.

Groovy is a dynamic language, which means that method and property names are looked up when your code is run, not when it’s compiled (like Java).

Let’s look at the following simple, but complete, script:

groovy
foo.bar()

We call the method bar() on the object foo. This script compiles without errors, but you get a MissingPropertyExceptionwhen you run the script because foo hasn’t been defined. This behaviour is useful because there are circumstances that could make this code execute successfully, like an object called foo or a closure getFoo() being passed to the script’s binding.

Although Groovy is a dynamic language, we can compile scripts in a manner that checks method and property references at compilation. The STC feature shows you problems in your scripts when you are writing them, as opposed to when they execute.

When your scripts are executed, they are always compiled dynamically. When they are compiled for the STC, the resulting generated bytecode is thrown away.

Limitations

There are limitations to the type checker. It is possible to write code that shows errors, but it is valid and executes fine. Some of these situations are:

• Using certain builders

• Using closures where the parameter types can’t be inferred

However, if you write code like this, you probably use an IDE, which does not work with the STC.

Additionally, your code could have runtime errors that won’t be found until the code executes.

Examples

The code for a condition to check that the remaining estimate on the issue was zero might look like the following:

The STC shows that we are trying to set the estimate, rather than retrieve it. We should have used the equality operator:

Note the green dot, which tells us that the code is syntactically correct after checking the methods and properties.

Let’s continue this example with code for Additional Issues Actions. This is commonly used to manipulate the resulting issue when creating a subtask or cloning and linking an issue.

 
issue.estimate = 0L

When code is not valid as a condition, it can be used as an additional issue action because the type checker is aware of what type the 'issue' object is when the code executes.

Deprecations

The STC also shows methods and properties that are deprecated. These are parts of the API that Atlassian would prefer you not to use.

In the following image, there is a deprecated method:

It is advisable to change your code to the suggested alternative because Atlassian usually removes deprecated code on major version releases. If you switch to the non-deprecated code, there is a better chance of your script continuing to work on your next upgrade.

A fixed version of the above script might look like:

Tips

Fields

To write classes, give information about the field types to the STC.

If you do not, you’ll receive the following STC errors:

Instead, declare your field types like this instead:

 
import com.atlassian.sal.api.component.ComponentLocator
import com.atlassian.applinks.api.ApplicationLinkService

class Foo {
    ApplicationLinkService applicationLinkService = ComponentLocator.getComponent(ApplicationLinkService)

    void doSomething() {
        applicationLinkService.getApplicationLinks()
    }
}

Closures

When writing closures, you may need to provide additional type information.

For example:

 
import com.atlassian.sal.api.component.ComponentLocator
import com.atlassian.applinks.api.ApplicationLinkService

def applicationLinkService = ComponentLocator.getComponent(ApplicationLinkService)

applicationLinkService.getApplicationLinks().findAll {
    it.name == "Confluence"
}

It is inferred from the context that the type of it is an ApplicationLink object.

While this code will execute without issues, the STC produces an error: No such property: name for class: java.lang.Object.

Using the following code, you can fix this error by explicitly informing the STC that the type of it is an ApplicatonLink object.

 
import com.atlassian.sal.api.component.ComponentLocator
import com.atlassian.applinks.api.ApplicationLinkService
import com.atlassian.applinks.api.ApplicationLink

def applicationLinkService = ComponentLocator.getComponent(ApplicationLinkService)

applicationLinkService.getApplicationLinks().findAll { ApplicationLink it ->
    it.name == "Confluence"
}

If you wanted to take the closure in the previous example and reuse it, you should write code like this:

 
import com.atlassian.sal.api.component.ComponentLocator
import com.atlassian.applinks.api.ApplicationLinkService
import com.atlassian.applinks.api.ApplicationLink

def applicationLinkService = ComponentLocator.getComponent(ApplicationLinkService)

def findApplicationByName = { ApplicationLink it -> it.name == "Confluence" }

applicationLinkService.getApplicationLinks().findAll(findApplicationByName)